|
|
Post by amithababuddha on Dec 11, 2004 20:00:04 GMT
i notested that asio 1.8 is much faster than 2.x on my 2.4ghz pentium processor. since i used 2.x i notested my system more heavier so im now using 1.8 again. anyway thanks for this great program  |
|
|
|
Post by Michael Tippach on Dec 12, 2004 22:42:32 GMT
If you compare 1.x against 2.x you need to do so with inputs disabled. With 1.8 it was possible that output still worked at low latencies, but input was unusable. With 2.x, the internal timing of the audio engine will ensure that input is always usable for as long as there is no overload. If you haven't used 1.8 for recording, you may not have noticed this.
Because of the requirement in 2.x, to never lose any input buffers, timing constraints in the audio engine are somewhat narrower. Disabling inputs in 2.x should yield results that are comparable to 1.8.
|
|
|
|
Post by Amithaba Buddha on Dec 13, 2004 13:57:43 GMT
hello Michael . Yes you´re right , ive never used 1.x for rec. |
|
